Activity 1 – Credibility Summary
When attaining information, it is always sensible to assess the reliability and trustworthiness of the source; this is no exception for Internet pages and websites. “Advances in ICT (information and communications technology)… now enable any person to send information to large numbers of individuals.” (Kato, Inui, Kurohashi, 2008, p. 142). Due to this openness there is a high chance of incorrect, or dishonest, reporting to be published online by individuals serving there own personal, or group, ambitions. A study done testing youth perception of credibility of information online, found that, “59 per cent reporting that “some” information found online was believable, and 30 per cent reporting that “a lot” of the information found online was believable”. (Flanagin, Metzger, Hartsell, 2010, p. 31-32). When assessing information, there are a number of things a student can check to check to validate the credibility of a source. Journalists check for four things. Provenance, is this the original piece of content, Source, who uploaded the content, Date, when was the content created, and Location, where was the content created? . Wrong information can lead to loss of marks and overall final score. Students should assess the quality of information for their own projects, as it is important for them to sustain their own credibility and reliability throughout their schooling career in assessments.
Bibliography
Kato, Y., Inui, K., Kurohashi, S., ebrary, I. & Ebrary. (2008). Information credibility
on the web. Bradford: Emerald.
Flanagin, A. J., Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E., & Ebrary. (2010). Kids and credibility: An
empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information
credibility. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
Activity 2
In the learning portfolio, Wikipedia is not accepted as a credible resource for academic assignments. What do you think is the reason Wikipedia is not accepted?
I believe that Wikipedia is not accepted in assignments as a credible source of information because, as it says on their own ‘about’ page, “Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles”. Ironically, I find that bit of information on Wikipedia very credible. Wikipedia has the capacity to have its pages information’s changed by anyone without any true expertise in the area; highly affecting it’s credibility. Expertise is, “the perceived knowledge, skill and experience of the source.” (Fogg, 2003, p. 124). Without the knowledge of a users previous insights into the subject, it is impossible to label a source as fully trustworthy, or credible on Wikipedia. This ability to let anyone edit notes on Wikipedia has also lead to the creation of, “heavy fights online called edit wars between groups representing opposing opinions.” (Yasseri, Sumi, Rung, Kornai, Kerész, 2012, p. 1). Rather then just expressing multiple possible opinions, parties believe their own versions of events are more truthful than others. This can lead to further misrepresentation of information in the future, subverting the original information’s truthfulness and purpose, “few barriers prevent people rom publishing on the web, you’ll find deceptive coverage of current events, health information that is factually incorrect, and ads that promise the impossible.” (Fogg, 2003, p. 148).
Bibliography
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Credibility and the World Wide Web. Persuasive Technology:
Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam: Morgan
Kaufmann
Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A., & Kertész, J. (2012). Dynamics of conflics
in wikipedia. Plos One, 7:6, e38869. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038869
Activity 3
In dot points, in your own words, list anticipated issues that may affect the users’ perceived Web credibility in the future.
- Keeping up with accessibility
It is important for websites to continue to provide feedback and interaction with their users or customers. As technology increases there will be faster ways of responding back. This accessibility can determine a website/companies perception by the public heavily. This can include accessibility for people with social drawbacks, or even disabilities.
- Keeping up with standards of web design
Just as other objects and outlets must keep up with standards of design to be competitive with their rivals, websites must do the same. By keeping up with standards of web design, companies and pages show their viewers/users that they are actively paying attention to their image, and figuratively their usage in the future. It also gives of the perception of being modern. Websites today that have designs reminiscent of the 1990’s are not usually perceived as very credible; it would be no different of web designs now seen in 2026.
- Keeping up with new outlets for promotion
At the moment, present outlets for promotion that exclude the original website include for example, Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter etc. These websites allow for different variations of interaction socially and promotionally. In the future it will be important for websites/business to identify these future outlets of promotion to interact with new audiences and demographics who may be interested in their pages.
Learning Portfolio – Item 2
Find a website for each type of credibility and upload snapshots of the websites on our blog site. Provide a brief explanation why the websites are credible.
Four Types of Web Credibility
- Presumed
Australia.gov.au
Presumed Credibility is defined by users pre-emptive opinions of the website in their mind. The ‘.gov’ in web-links connotes official credibility before viewing. The belief that government officials approve the web-link provides a more assuring chance for credible information
- Reputed
Google.com
Reputed websites refer to those that have been promoted or praised by a third party, either by winning awards or just through word of mouth. Google has won numerous awards for it’s design and ease of usage, making it the most popular search engine of the modern age
- Surface
Tumblr.com
Blogs and personal websites are considered to have Surface Credibility as their believability is established through first glances and simple examination. These websites attempt to show more through visual media than text, to communicate more through connotation.
- Earned
Abc.net.au/news/
News websites have recently had a tendency to show advertising and the promotion of certain products through news stories, providing a bias outlook on specific subjects. Abc.net.au is a website that has earned it’s credibility for me, due to it’s various multi-cultural types of perspectives and newsworthy stories. It also has not shown to provide any certain political point of view, staying as journalistically integral as they can.